Read The Dimensions of Consequentialism: Ethics, Equality and Risk - Martin Peterson file in PDF
Related searches:
Consequentialist Decision Theory And Utilitarian - beenews.com
The Dimensions of Consequentialism: Ethics, Equality and Risk
Dimensions consequentialism ethics equality and risk Ethics
Kant, Eudaimonism, Act-Consequentialism and the Fact of Reason
The Dimensions of Consequentialism : Ethics, Equality and
Personality and moral judgment: Curious consequentialists and
Contractualism and Punishment
Consequentialism and the Value of Autonomy - PhilArchive
Multi-Dimensional Consequentialism and Risk
Global consequentialism and the ethics of war - General guide to
(PDF) Multidimensional Consequentialism and Risk
Multi-dimensional consequentialism and degrees of rightness
Consequentialism and Environmental Ethics Reviews Notre
Understanding the Different Dimensions and Branches of Ethics
1744 1840 3552 3174 705 1926 1733 241 3814 2836 2126
The doctrine of double (and triple) effect combines deontological and consequentialist ethics, where deontology has a greater emphasis than consequentialism.
Cambridge university press cambridge, new york, melbourne, madrid, cape town, singapore, são paulo, delhi, mexico city cambridge university press.
Dec 18, 2018 consequentialism is an ethical theory that judges an action's moral correctness by its consequences.
Peterson, the dimensions of consequentialism: ethics, equality and risk, (cambridge: cambridge university press, 2013) 217 pages. Peterson’s book contains several new and interesting ideas and arguments.
Martin peterson's book the dimensions of consequentialism attempts to develop a multidimensional version of consequentialism, according to which there are a number of irreducible aspects belonging to different dimensions that determine an act's rightness. These dimensions are meant to include well‐being, equality and risk.
Consequentialism, one of the major theories of normative ethics, maintains that the moral rightness of an act is determined solely by the act's consequences. The traditional form of consequentialism is one-dimensional, in that the rightness of an act is a function of a single moral aspect, such as the sum total of wellbeing it produces.
Further division of prescriptive ethics classifies the subject under consequentialism which refers to moral theories that hold the consequences of a certain action as the foundation for any relevant moral judgement regarding the particular action. This view is easily understood in the aphorism- ‘the ends justify the means.
Negative consequentialism is a version of consequentialism, which is one of the major theories of normative ethics.
Feb 15, 2016 bentham's theory of utilitarianism focussed on which actions were most likely to make people happy.
1 multi-dimensional consequentialism consequentialism, at the most general level, is the view that normative properties depend only on consequences. This general approach can be applied at different levels to different normative properties of different kinds of things, but the most prominent example is consequentialism about the moral rightness of acts.
[review] michael cholbi - 2013 - notre dame philosophical reviews 2013:1-2. Review of martin peterson's the dimensions of consequentialism.
Use the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues.
Review of martin peterson - the dimensions of consequentialism. Peterson's core claim is that the deontic status of an act will often depend upon multiple irreducible aspects of the consequences. An act that is right with respect to one aspect may be wrong with respect to another. For instance, an act might have beneficial effects on equality, while resulting in lower welfare.
Religious 2017 studies, 53 (1): 51-70 • 'multi-dimensional consequentialism and degrees of 2016 rightness', with vuko andric, philosophical studies 173(3):.
In this article i respond to comments and objections raised in the special issue on my book the dimensions of consequentialism. I defend my multi-dimensional consequentialist theory against a range of challenges articulated by thomas schmidt, campbell brown, frances howard-snyder, roger crisp, vuko andric and attila tanyi, and jan gertken.
Buy the dimensions of consequentialism: ethics, equality and risk by peterson, martin (isbn: 9781107033030) from amazon's book store.
1 it is well known that sen defined utilitarianism as the combination of consequentialism, welfarism and sum-ranking (sen 1979).
The traditional form of consequentialism is one-dimensional, in that the rightness of an act is a function of a single moral aspect, such as the sum total of wellbeing it produces. In this book martin peterson introduces a new type of consequentialist theory: multidimensional consequentialism. According to this theory, an act's moral rightness depends on several separate dimensions, including individual wellbeing, equality and risk.
The dimensions of consequentialism: ethics, equality and risk consequentialist moral theory is contemporary philosophy's hydra. Just as one version of consequentialism is articulated and then criticized, more versions are generated in its stead.
Peterson, the dimensions of consequentialism: ethics, equality and risk, (cambridge: cambridge university press, 2013) 217 pages. Peterson’s book contains several new and interesting ideas and arguments. He argues, in chapter 2, that rightness and wrongness come in degrees.
May 15, 2014 this view is known as consequentialism: that the consequences of an action are all that matter in moral assessment.
Much of the philosophical discussion concerning consequentialism has focused on moral rightness or obligation or normativity.
Subsequent actions are mediated though ethical decision-making frames of reference including deontology, consequentialism, the ethics of care and virtue ethics. Nurses use these in contributing to the resolution of these dilemmas.
Yet consequentialism involves endorsing not just instrumental harm, but also impartial beneficence, treating the well-being of every individual as equally important.
I defend my multi-dimensional consequentialist theory against a range of challenges articulated by thomas schmidt, campbell brown, frances howard-snyder, roger crisp, vuko andric and attila tanyi, and jan gertken. My aim is to show that multi-dimensional consequentialism is, at least, a coherent and intuitively.
The dimensions of consequentialism consequentialism, one of the major theories of normative ethics, maintains that the moral rightness of an act is determined solely by the act's consequences. The traditional form of consequentialism is one-dimensional, in that the rightness of an act is a function of a single moral aspect, such as the sum total of wellbeing it produces.
Jun 9, 2020 for parfit the issue of whether kantianism and consequentialism can be reconciled thus greatly impacts our understanding of ethical theorizing.
Consequentialism is a major moral theory in contemporary philosophy: it is the view that the only thing that matters when making moral decisions is the outcome of those decisions. Consequentialists hold that to morally assess an act, we must first evaluate and rank the various ways that things could turn out depending on whether it or some alternative act is performed.
Section 2 reviews the background theory of global consequentialism.
Consequentialism is the view that, in some sense, rightness is to be understood in terms of conduciveness to goodness. Much of the philosophical discussion concerning consequentialism has focused on moral rightness or obligation or normativity. But there is plausibly also epistemic rightness, epistemic obligation, and epistemic normativity.
A symposium on martin peterson's book 'the dimensions of consequentialism' ( cup)november 16-17, 2013, university of konstanz, germany.
The same genus as utilitarianism: reliabilism is also a version of consequentialism so really we have one specter haunting both ethics and epistemology.
Consequentialism is broader than utilitarianism in that consequentialism can say that the value of outcomes depend on other things than well-being; for example, justice, fairness, and equality, or in that it can say that the value of outcomes depend on well-being but not necessarily aggregate well-being (as it happens, for instance, with prioritarianism, which promotes achieving the higher level of happiness minus suffering but giving priority to the well-being of the worse off).
Oct 6, 2020 abstract objective how does our personality relate to the ways in which we judge right from wrong? drawing on influential theories of moral.
Albrecht, “the consequential dimension of mormon religiosity,” in latter -day saint social life: social research on the lds church and its members.
The costs of being consequentialist: social inference from instrumental harm and impartial beneficence.
Keywords moral justifications, deontology, consequentialism, emotion, persuasive appeals, moral foundations on the social dimensions of moral psychology.
Dec 31, 2003 the theory of morality we can call full rule-consequentialism selects rules solely in terms of the goodness of their consequences and then.
In his new book, the dimensions of consequentialism, martin peterson proposes a version of multi-dimensional consequentialism according to which risk is one among several dimensions.
Oct 11, 2018 consequentialist views are often contrasted with deontological ethics. Here, the moral value of actions and choices is not to be evaluated solely.
The one hand and kantian ethics and consequentialism on the other is that virtue ethics is not a theory about what makes an action right.
Aug 27, 2015 it supports non-consequentialism––the theory that both consequences and deontological considerations are morally significant in moral.
Business ethics and societytaking utilitarianism seriouslyethics for a-levelthe dimensions of consequentialismconsequentialisman introduction to property.
Consequentialism is a major moral theory and a rival to such non- consequentialist theories as deontology, contractualism, and virtue ethics.
A major challenge in contemporary ethical theory is to justify options. This paper offers a new argument for moral options and against act-consequentialism.
Although classically associated with act-consequentialism, 1 the demandingness objection has been applied to a wide range of other theories and principles, including scanlonian contractualism ( ashford 2003), kantian ethics ( van ackeren and sticker 2015), and principles of beneficence ( cullity 2004; wellman 2005) and distributive justice.
Describes and compares between objectives of different ethical theories. It deals with ethical questions like what do people think is right? it is different from normative and applied ethics.
In the dimensions of consequentialism (cambridge up 2013) i introduce and defend a distinction between multidimensional and one-dimensional.
Abstract in his new book, the dimensions of consequentialism,martinpetersonproposesa version of multi-dimensional consequentialism according to which risk is one among several dimensions. We argue that peterson’s treatment of risk is unsatisfactory.
Rule-consequentialism manifestly has the capacity to recommend change. Rule-consequentialism most definitely does need to be formulated so as to deal with ties in expected value. However, for the rest of this article, i will ignore this complication.
Feb 20, 2015 no matter which reading of kant's agent-based theory -contractualist or consequentialist- one chooses to adopt, the moral autarky of the kantian.
Post Your Comments: