Download The Case Against Consequentialism Reconsidered - Nikil Mukerji file in ePub
Related searches:
133 2822 1304 1185 87 1298 1367 2576 388 1202 3318 2798 1920 1370 1132 4153 2656 1876 4053 1461 2756 308 2319 449 348 512 4303
Sep 9, 2018 i love good consequences, but i am against consequentialism. Freiman writes that economic and political freedom helps us feed the hungry, heal.
Aug 15, 2008 put simply, the rightness of an action or a political policy or institution turns on its tendency to produce maximally good consequences.
This methodology relies on the crucial assumption that consequentialist theories share a defining characteristic.
Jul 25, 2014 what about the epistemic argument against consequentialism, either maintaining its non-viability as a decision procedure or (more.
The paradigm case of consequentialism is utilitarianism, whose classic proponents were jeremy bentham (1789), john stuart mill (1861), and henry sidgwick (1907).
Jul 19, 2011 and so on – for each new potential enhancement, the consequentialist will always be confronted with the fact that, if she only took this pill (wore.
The consequences of accepting consequentialism katy baker on the demands of consequentialist theories of morality. “jim finds himself in the central square of a small south american town. Tied up against the wall are a row of twenty indians, most terrified, a few defiant, in front of them several armed men in uniform.
Consequentialism, our intuitions tell us, is too demanding on joe when it requires that he sacrifice a kidney to sally.
The case against consequentialism 655 definitional method (dm) step 1: define consequentialism in terms of a necessary and sufficient feature (or necessary and jointly sufficient set of features) that is shared by all consequentialist.
Demandingness and other objections the demandingness objection makes a simple case against consequentialism: since the consequentialist agent is required to maximize the overall balance of good consequences, this is excessively demanding (in our present circum- stances), hence objectionable (because one should be given the opportunity to have a life outside morality).
Com: the rejection of consequentialism: a philosophical investigation of his reconsideration of the case against consequentialism has been highly.
The trolley problem was an experiment that looked to explore the concept of human morality and a philosophical view of consequentialism. The general form of the problem went as follows: you have two options. The first option is to do nothing, which results in the trolley killing five people.
In this article, i’m going to give you a brief introduction to consequentialism ethics, diving first into a definition of consequentialism (including a definition of non-consequentialism, and the arguments against consequentialism ethics as a whole), before looking at examples of consequentialism in everyday life, and the difference between.
It is also claimed that, because consequentialists must always aim at the good, impartially conceived, they cannot place adequate value on—or even enter.
Kupperman consequentialism is one of the most keenly, and least adequately debated theories in the history of philosophy. 1 much of the existing debate has been carried on by means of discussion of apparent counter-examples.
Moral attacks on consequentialism amount to nothing other than a weighing of one moral belief over another and ultimately any argument against consequentialism based on moral grounds will result in a shouting match. 1 bentham, jeremy, the principles of morals and legislation, (buffalo: prometheus books, 1988).
I make a case for consequentialism against the intention heuristic in cases of high causal density. In such cases, it is very hard to know the consequences of one’s actions. Will raising the minimum wage by $1 do more good than harm for low-wage workers? we don’t know. You have to take whatever information is at hand and make your best.
May 4, 2011 at the risk of being thought to exhibit a corrupt mind and a shal- low consequentialist morality, i should like to argue that things are not as simple.
Oct 14, 2010 however, it is possible to instil responsibility through a consequentialism based on a broader conception of relatedness, inspired by deleuze.
One of the main objections to it—and, we shall see, all core consequentialist theories—is that it fails to recognize any (deontological) constraints on the promotion.
Consequentialism and its internal problems: the premise #1 assumes the truth of consequentialism. Theories assuming that morality is a function of bringing about good results (benefits) and avoiding bad results (harms) are all versions of consequentialism. Stated very roughly, here are two general ideas associated with consequentialist thinking.
While this argument can be sustained almost indefinitely with different viewpoints and counter-arguments, as is the case in many reviews and studies of the subject, yet the in the final analysis the question of whether consequentialism is an adequate philosophy and ethical structure in terms of criminal and legal ethics, has to be answered.
Consequentialism can struggle to compare different moral values. The other concern people express is the tendency of consequentialism to use ‘ends justify the means’ logic. If all we are concerned with is getting good outcomes, this can seem to justify harming some people in order to benefit others.
What about the epistemic argument against consequentialism, either maintaining its non-viability as a decision procedure or (more profoundly) as an argument against the criterion of rightness view, on the grounds that it would seem to leave open or epistemically uncertain the rightness (or wrongness) of actions for which we are certain of the action's status as right or wrong.
Dec 11, 2015 i selected your thoughtful question, john, because it has important bearing on two issues: ethical theory and the problem of evil.
Apr 1, 2008 utilitarianism without consequentialism: the case of john stuart mill essay argues, flouting paradox, that mill was a utilitarian but not a consequentialist.
Accordingly luhmann advances three arguments against consequentialism in the application of law: the argument of legal certainty, the argument of legal.
On darwall's interpretation, the prin- ciple the agent affirms may still be a consequentialist normative principle.
Sep 16, 2009 the most ubiquitous objection against consequentialism generally and utilitarianism in particular is that it demands too much, requiring agents.
Hence consequentialism would seem to ask us to support laws that protect personal freedom against excessive interference by our neighbors or our government. A different kind of reply to the objection is to propose a new standard for the goodness of consequences.
Feb 15, 2016 bentham's theory of utilitarianism focussed on which actions were most likely to make people happy.
May 12, 2016 good is the action that morally ought to be taken.
Smart's comments on page 42 in smart and bernard williams, utilitarianism: for and against, cambridge university press.
The case against consequentialism reconsidered (theory and decision library a: book 51) ebook: mukerji, nikil: amazon.
Another discussion from the literature on consequentialism focuses on a closely related point.
Jan 11, 2020 six case studies in consequentialist reasoning case 1: there are 100 miners stuck in a mineshaft with flood waters rising.
About the authors this book argues that critics of consequentialism have not been able to make a successful and comprehensive case against all versions of consequentialism because they have been using the wrong methodology. This methodology relies on the crucial assumption that consequentialist theories share a defining characteristic.
May 15, 2014 suppose your friend, on her deathbed, makes you promise to spread her ashes in the how might a consequentialist respond to these cases?.
Jan 28, 2020 on the right, white nationalists exhibit a similar inconsistency, wavering between deontological and consequentialist arguments.
There are several objections to consequentialism as a basis for morality. Some of these objections are of considerable scholarly interest to philosophers; but i think the most powerful objection is that adherence to consequentialism can in some cases result in injustice.
Railton’s “alienation, consequentialism, and the demands of morality” martín abreu zavaleta july 14, 2015 railton is addressing one kind of problem that we raised. In class, we discussed the case of a parent who is offered a choice between saving the life of her own child or saving the life of another child.
Consequentialism is a class of normative, teleological ethical theories that holds that the consequences of one's conduct are the ultimate basis for any judgment.
Post Your Comments: